BIBLIOGRAPHY

AARON, JAMES. The Authors Guild v. HathiTrust: a way forward for digi- tal access to neglected works in libraries, Lewis and Clark Law Review, vol. 16, no. 3 (2012), pp. 1317-47.
ABOUD, LESLIE. Who owns the ruby slippers?: an analysis of the impact of Warner Bros. v. X One X on visual depictions in copyright law. (Warner Bros. Entm’t, Inc. v. X One X Prods., 644 F.3d 584, 2011.), Jour- nal of Corporation Law, vol. 38, no. 2 (Winter 2013), pp. 399-419.
ACKERMAN, JUSTIN M. An online gamer’s manifesto: recognizing virtual property rights by replacing end user licensing agreements in virtual worlds, Phoenix Law Review, vol. 6, no. 1 (Fall 2012), pp. 137-88.
BARTHOLOMEW, MARK AND JOHN TEHRANIAN. An intersystemic view of intellectual property and free speech, George Washington Law Review, vol. 81, no. 1 (2013), pp. 1-91.COLLINS, JOANNA E. User-friendly licensing for a user-generated world: the future of the video-content market, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertain- ment & Technology Law, vol. 15, no. 2 (Winter 2013), pp. 407-40.
COOPER, AARON M. Legislative update. Mass media mess: the optimistic deregulatory goals of the “Next Generation Television Marketplace Act”, DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law, vol. 23, no. 1 (Fall 2012), pp. 201-36.
DAVIES, JAMISON. Art crimes?: theoretical perspectives on copyright pro- tection for illegally-created graffiti art, Maine Law Review, vol. 65, no. 1 (2012), pp. 27-55.