1. United States

ABOUD, LESLIE. Who owns the ruby slippers?: an analysis of the impact of Warner Bros. v. X One X on visual depictions in copyright law, Journal of Corporation Law, vol. 38, no. 3 (2013), pp. 399-419.
ARSHAM, BRYAN E. Monetizing infringement: a new legal regime for hosts of user-generated content, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 101, vol. 3 (Mar. 2013), pp. 775-805.
BADER, CHRISTOPHER K. Peer-to-peer file-sharing, due process, and the judicial role, St. Louis University Law Journal, vol. 57, no. 3 (Spring 2013), pp. 805-38.
BEEBE, BARTON. Fair use and legal futurism, Law and Literature, vol. 25, no. 1 (2013), pp. 10-19 (2013).
BLANKE, JORDAN M. No doubt about it – you’ve got to have Hart: simu- lation video games may redefine the balance between and among the right of publicity, the First Amendment, and copyright law, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, vol. 19, no. 1 (Winter 2013), pp.
BLOOM, CRAIG P. Hangover effect: may I see your tattoo, please?, Car- dozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 31, no. 2 (2013), pp. 435-
BODNER, CARRIE. Master copies, unique copies and volitional conduct: Cartoon Network’s implications for the liability of cyber lockers, Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, vol. 36, no. 3 (Spring 2013), pp. 491-525.
BOLLINGER, KRISTEN ELISABETH. A new hope for copyright: the U.K. Supreme Court ruling in Lucasfilm Ltd. v. Ainsworth and why Congress should follow suit, Journal of Intellectual Property Law, vol. 20, no. 1 (2012), pp. 87-119.

\\jciprod01\productn\C\CPY\60-3\CPY313.txt unknown Seq: 2 9-SEP-13 10:03